FHRS/OSM comparison

Middlesbrough

District statistics

The colours in this table act as a key for the maps below

OSM nodes/ways with valid fhrs:id and matching addr:postcode or not:addr:postcode 0
Relevant OSM nodes/ways with postcode but no valid fhrs:id 76 GPX
Relevant OSM nodes/ways without postcode or fhrs:id 303 GPX
OSM nodes/ways with valid fhrs:id but mismatched/missing postcode 0
OSM nodes/ways with invalid fhrs:id 0 GPX
FHRS establishments with no matching OSM node/way 66 GPX
Total number of relevant OSM nodes/ways 379
Total number of FHRS establishments 66
Percentage of FHRS establishments successfully matched* 0.0%
Percentage of relevant OSM nodes/ways with a postcode** 20.1%

*A match is considered successful when the OSM node/way's fhrs:id matches an FHRS one and the OSM addr:postcode or not:addr:postcode matches the FHRS one.

**OSM nodes/ways with an addr:postcode or not:addr:postcode that matches the FHRS postcode, or with an addr:postcode but no fhrs:id tag.

Overview

Dotted lines in the map below show the difference between the OSM and FHRS locations for establishments that have been matched when those locations are more than 500 metres apart. Please see the table below for a list of these distant matches.

Suggested matches

Download suggested matches GPX

Postcodes missing/mismatched

There are no postcode errors to show for this district.

Mismatched fhrs:id tags

There are no fhrs:id mismatches to show for this district.

Duplicate fhrs:id tags

There are no fhrs:id duplicates to show for this district.

Distant matches

There are no distant matches to show for this district.


Generated using python-fhrs-osm on Fri 20 Oct 2017 at 07:31.

Report bug or suggest feature

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right